Overview
Overview

Key Findings

  1. Policy, capital and consumers have driven a near doubling of climate action in Canada over the past five years, according to the RBC Climate Action Institute’s Climate Action Barometer.
  2. Emissions fell by 0.8% in 2023, led by progress in the electricity sector. Government projections suggest Canada is not on course to meet its 2030 climate targets.Endnote 1
  3. Alberta’s removal of more than six megatonnes of coal-based emissions drove national electricity emissions lower by about 12%.Endnote 2 The province is now coal free—six years ahead of schedule. Only Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick remain coal-dependent for electricity.
  4. There was an estimated 50% improvement in managing methane emissions from oil and gas projects relative to 2019.Endnote 3 While the sector’s overall GHG emissions remain high due to rising production, emissions intensity is estimated to have dropped to a six-year low.Endnote 4
  5. The oil and gas index’s capital score rose 36% in 2024 compared to 2019, suggesting considerable investments in decarbonizing the sector.Endnote 5 The country’s first carbon capture, utilization and storage project targeting upstream oilsands facilities was also announced in 2024.Endnote 6
  6. Concern over climate change is waning among Canadians. Around 14% of Canadians cited climate change as one of their top 3 concerns—compared to 26% in 2019.
  7. Clean-tech investments in heavy industry fell dramatically in 2024. Venture capital financing slowed to $158 million in the year, compared to a combined $650 million on average in the previous two years, partly due to an overall global downturn in investment flows and faltering investor sentiment around cleantech.Endnote 7
  8. Canadian businesses see themselves on the frontlines of climate action, according to our survey. Over half of executives identified government subsidies (55%), internal funding (53%), and C-suite buy-in (50%) as the most significant factors for driving emissions reduction in their organizations.
  9. Cement and steel industries cut their coal consumption by 36-40%, respectively, as they made the switch from coal to natural gas to transition away from fossil-fuel power by 2050.Endnote 8
  10. Transport sector emissions are 6-8% below 2019 peak.Endnote 9 Emissions are set to decline further as gas-powered vehicles peaked in 2021, and a hybrid workforce has dented traffic flows.

This report relies on information provided by third parties. RBC shall not be held liable for and cannot guarantee the accuracy of information provided by third parties. Please refer to the Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in our Disclaimers section here.

2025: A year for rewiring

Welcome to 2025, the midpoint of climate’s decisive decade—and a year that already feels an age apart from its predecessor.

Over the next 12 months, a plethora of new governments in much of the world will try to rebalance climate policy with economic, energy and national security needs, while business will come to terms with a new and uncertain investing cycle, and a frustrated public will again weigh the cost of living with the cost of climate action.

As the world approaches the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement, this year could indeed be a hinge moment. Will 2025 bring a reckoning for climate action or a realization that more can be done, perhaps just in different ways? And will Canada—an energy, trade and climate leader—be among those developing a new path forward or bringing about a strategic retreat in a rapidly changing and divided world?

In this, our second annual assessment of Canadian climate action, we find plenty of cause for concern, and some reason for hope. The RBC Climate Action Institute, which was created in 2023, has developed climate action models to analyze where the country and economy is at, and our team has interviewed scores of climate leaders to assess the opportunities ahead.

As we detail in Climate Action 2025, Canada is still making progress, in cutting emissions, mobilizing investment, advancing public policy and driving innovation across the economy. But that progress—along with public support—is slowing, adding to pressure for new ideas to get to net-zero in the quarter century ahead.

In this year’s report, you will find:

  • our proprietary national index, which assesses policy ambitions, investment flows, business and consumer views, and emissions progress. The index shows that we may have reached a peak of policy interventions from the federal government, and in the years ahead will need more private capital and innovation.
  • sector indices that measure the commitments and investments in the six heaviest emitting sectors: oil and gas, electricity, transportation, buildings, heavy industry and agriculture.
  • case studies of Canadian innovators making climate progress, and what they’re learning. These entrepreneurs and businesses are engaged in industries as diverse as animal genetics and carbon capture, each making very different contributions to Canada’s climate goals that every enterprise, private or public, can draw insights from.
  • a spotlight on what we call the Idea of the Year—electricity—and how it can help rewire our collective climate strategy. If Canada had to pick one priority for the next half-decade, we make the case that the best return, for emissions reduction and economic growth, could come from building out a low-carbon electricity grid. Our feature essay looks additionally at the special role of Indigenous equity, and what that could do for reconciliation.

None of this is evolving outside the context of political change, economic frustration and the many climate disasters, which continue to reshape the 2020s. In 2024, we endured the warmest year on record, coinciding with droughts in southern Africa, devastating floods in southern Europe and a wildfire that destroyed much of Jasper, Alberta. One estimate concluded the 10 worst climate events of the year killed 2,000 people and caused US$229 billion in damages.Endnote 10

All the while, many of the governing parties that championed Paris, and then the 2021 Glasgow climate conference that increased the ambition for emissions reductions, are either out of power or on the political ropes.

Moving forward, in the United States, the incoming Trump administration and Republican Congress will almost certainly reorient American energy and climate policies, and alter the trading norms that underpin much of the world’s climate action and investments. One of the early signals from a new Washington may be its commitment to the Inflation Reduction Act, which not only underwrote an unprecedented investment wave in new energy systems in 2023 and 2024; it forced governments across Europe, Canada and Asia to respond with their own supersized cleantech subsidy programs.

Europe, long a climate leader, is undergoing its own political convulsions, and a new European parliament will need to signal if it’s truly committed to tariffs based on the carbon intensity of imports. And the world’s other cleantech leader, China, will need to determine if it can sustain its heavy support for the removal of coal-fired power and expansion of EVs, among other climate policies, in the face of a struggling economy.

Many of the governing parties that championed Paris are either out of power or on the political ropes

Here in Canada, the federal government will need to consider the fate of an unpopular retail carbon tax, and also the future of industrial policies—electricity regulations, emissions restrictions and fuel standards, among them—in the new reality of a Donald Trump-led America. Provinces, too, will be confronted with the budgetary pressures, and public demands, for more (and more affordable) electricity.

Our annual business survey

We surveyed more than 100 Canadian private sector executives, working with Kantar Canada Inc., to understand how the business sector is navigating Canadas policies to lower emissions. Here’s what they told us:

  • A majority see government subsidies (55%), dedicated internal funding (53%), and C-suite buy-in (50%) as the three top factors that will drive emissions reduction in their organizations.
  • Two-thirds of executives see themselves as drivers of climate strategy for their organization, but those in electricity, heavy industry and transport believe government regulations are primary drivers of change.
  • Oil and gas, heavy industry and electricity executives see regulatory uncertainty as their biggest obstacle.
  • 42% see governments as primarily responsible for climate change mitigation, but also see themselves (40%) as equally responsible. Customers are a distant third at 16%.
  • 36% of businesses have a senior executive advocating for environmental issues.

A new role for climate capitalism

There may be no greater opportunity for climate action than the private sector, especially in terms of mobilizing venture capital for some of the most daring technology projects we’re seeing anywhere. This report maps out some of the investment needs, as well as many of the successes to date, that can get us there. We tracked close to 350 climate-related emerging technology projects that are already underway, including ground-breaking work in small modular nuclear reactors in Ontario, methane capping of gas wells in British Columbia and Alberta, and industrial-scale decarbonization efforts in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces.

Much of this is the result of sizeable government funding announcements—$177 billion worth over the past decade, according to our tracking.Endnote 11 Without the massive subsidies offered through the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act and the European Green Deal, major industries are at risk of pulling back. More public-private investments may be needed, along with more strategic procurement from public sector entities.

Business adoption is also powerful. Many of the cleantech headlines of 2024 focused on the stumbles of startups like Montreal’s Taiga Motors and Kingston, Ontario’s Li-Cycle. That can be a natural part of the innovation cycle, and its inherent nature of creative destruction. More concerning would be any extended pause or change in strategy among large corporates—and so-called ecosystem leaders—such as Ford Motors, which delayed the start of EV production at its plant in Oakville, Ontario, by two years, to 2027, and paused work on a $1.2-billion cathode material plant in Becancour, Quebec.

Canadian climate action was driven by
$177 billion
in government funding announcements over the past decade

Our annual survey of Canadian business leaders shows a majority still see themselves as drivers of climate action in their organizations, with necessary support from governments (through regulations and subsidies) as well as institutional investors focused on the long term. By the same token, most business leaders do not seem to feel pressure, or encouragement for that matter, from their customers. That view was reinforced by our annual consumer survey that showed only one in seven Canadians now place climate among their top three concerns.

As this report outlines, the efforts of the past decade won’t likely be the flagships of the decade ahead. We’ve probably seen peak policy, with the federal government going as far as it can, and perhaps being overextended. Provinces need to step up more, in our view, as do municipalities. As you will see in our national index and public sentiment analysis, we’re also seeing consumers recoil from any climate action that costs them more, while businesses are showing more caution and government spending priorities are shifting. The brightest spot may be Indigenous equity, which continues to grow across the economy and is critical to climate, as well as economic and social progress.

As government and business consider the next half decade, they may do well to consider different models, perhaps even paradigms. Technology may be a centrepiece of a Trump economic agenda, especially to help reshore manufacturing, whether it’s low emitting or otherwise. Convenience and cost will also become more pressing for businesses and governments, if they’re to convince the public to adopt lower-emitting products and services.

More broadly, “security” could be the new watchword. A range of governments, and notably the incoming Trump administration, have entered the year with an enhanced focus on national security—and a view that economic security and energy security are twin pillars of that new paradigm. Climate security may soon be part of that model if climate policy and practice can be viewed as essential to our collective economic and energy needs.

In some ways, that has always been the imperative of climate action—to ensure emissions reduction can be achieved without damaging the prosperity of nations and of people. The year ahead may just demonstrate how that can be done.

Our annual consumer survey

We worked with Ipsos Canada to survey 2,000 Canadians on their views of climate action. Here’s what they told us:

  • 14% of Canadians cited climate change as one of their top 3 concerns, down from 26% in 2019.
  • 58% believe climate action is important but other things need more attention and action right now.
  • Two-thirds of residents in B.C., Alberta and Ontario were more bullish than the national average about the economic opportunity stemming from green jobs.
  • Baby boomers (59%) felt a greater sense of responsibility than Gen Z (45%) to take climate action. Half of Gen X and Millennials had the same view.
  • 65% of Quebecers believe it’s consumers’ responsibility to tackle climate action, compared to the national average of 53%.
  • Baby Boomers felt they had a greater sense of duty to act, but were two or three times less then Gen X likely to act on making their homes energy efficient, installing a heat pump, or buying an EV.